Saturday, February 16, 2013

Hi-diddly-ho, neighborino!





"Hi-diddly-ho, neighborino!"
– Ned Flanders' catch phrase (this one from The Simpsons season 7, episode #5 "Lisa the Vegetarian")

It just goes to show that if you do it with a friendly attitude and in a chipper tone of voice then you can call someone a ho.  Calling someone a ho who is high is basically the same as calling them a crack whore.

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Meet Creole gal who help you to come out of your shell


From the movie Girls Girls Girls (1962) : Elvis Presley singing the Shrimp Song.


Lyrics :
I saw three shrimp in the water, two were old and gray
I swam a little bit closer and I heard the third one say
Goodbye mama shrimp, papa shake my hand
Here come the shrimp boat for to take me to Louisian'
Here come the shrimp boat for to take me to Louisian'
He showed his mama and papa, the shrimp newspaper he read
An invitation to all the shrimp and this is what it said
Free ride, New Orleans, stay in grand hotel
Meet Creole gal who help you to come out of your shell
Meet Creole gal who help you to come out of your shell
If I should live to be ninety, I will never forget
The little shrimp and the song he sang as he jumped into the net
Goodbye mama shrimp, papa shake my hand
Here come the shrimp boat for to take me to Louisian'
Here come the shrimp boat for to take me to Louisian'
Here come the shrimp boat for to take me to Louisian'
Here come the shrimp boat for to take me to Louisian'




Townes Van Zandt singing the same song but in a way that makes the little shrimp's situation sound more depressing.

Monday, February 11, 2013

An Allegory of the Revolution with a Portrait Medallion of Jean-Jacques Rousseau

An Allegory of the Revolution with a portrait medallion of Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-78) 1794 by Nicolas Henri Jeaurat de Bertry
click to embiggen

An Allegory of the Revolution with a Portrait Medallion of Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-78) by Nicolas Henri Jeaurat de Bertry, 1794, oil on canvas.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau died in 1778 and the French Revolution started 1789. By 1794, when this was painted the Reign of Terror was nearing an end.

elements of An Allegory of the Revolution with a portrait medallion of Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-78) 1794 by Nicolas Henri Jeaurat de Bertry
elements of the painting



Elements of the painting
1.  Top center is a medallion portrait of Jean-Jacques Rousseau labeled "J. J. Rousseau" hangs from a gold cord in the sky.  The medallion as a painting in a painting is a trompe l'oeil effect. Rousseau looks old and stern.
2.  to the right of the portrait is a circular blob. Perhaps it is supposed to be the cover to the portrait like a locket.
3.  below the portrait is the all-seeing eye (or Eye of Providence) with light radiating symbolizing the supreme being. An all seeing eye seems specifically about being watched and judged. (while this is a conventional depiction of the all seeing eye, it is interesting that it is not just the eye or the eye and eyelids but it is the eye, eyelids and also an eyebrow)
4.  below that is a pair of French Tricolor flags on flagpoles with spear shaped finials suspended by a red, white & blue ribbon with text written on them :
  • written on the left flag : "amour de la patrie" (patriotism ; literally "love of the fatherland")
  • written on the right flag : "Republique francaise" (French Republic)
  • The French Tricolor was adopted in 1794 and replaced the King's flag of a white field with  yellow fleur-de-lis and a blue shield
  • the flags and portrait are hanging from an unknown source.
5.  below the flags is a Phrygian cap (aka a liberty cap, aka a red smurf hat) a symbol of freedom. The cap rests at the top of a Liberty Pole.
6.  below the cap is a laurel wreath. Being round it might symbolize eternity but it is usually a symbol of victory.
7.  the Phrygian cap rests on a bundle of sticks and axes (specifically a fasces) symbolizing order and "strength through unity." The fasces originated with the Roman Republic and it's use during the revolution was intended to harken back to that past. The fasces are bound together in flower garlands and has 4 labels on it : 
  • "force" (force)
  • "vérité" (truth)
  • "justice" (justice)
  • "union" (union)
8.  below the fasces is what appears to be a sack of papers (I can't tell what is written on them). The sack kind of looks like a horn of plenty (cornucopia) which is a symbol of abundance. Below the cornucopia appears to be spring water coming out of the ground.
9.  next to the sack a sitting dog looks up at the fasces symbolizing loyalty.
10. on the bottom left is a hen with chicks being watched by a cock (rooster). The rooster is symbol of France, ancient Gaul and in particular the Republic aka Coq Gaulois (the Gallic Rooster). Perhaps, together they are a symbol of family.
11. above the chickens are two women in modest dresses, almost robes, standing hand in hand are holding a label that says something I can't make out. A handshake is a symbol of fraternity. Next to the women appear to be a single sheep.  A sheep may represent a religious flock or those to be shepherded. The sheep may be too large to be considered a sacrificial lamb. 
12. above and to the left of the women is a triangular obelisk marked with a triangle and "Egalité" (equality) and on the rectangular part of the obelisk is inscribed "c'est le courage qui établit les republique; C'est la vertu qui les conserves" (It is the courage that sets republic; This is the virtue that preserves.)
  • the triangle might be used as a symbol of balance 
  • the triangle might be a reference to the Three Estates :  the First Estate (clergy); the Second Estate (nobility); and the Third Estate (commoners)
  • to the right and behind the obelisk are 2 triangular things that could be 2 more obelisks but I'm not sure. They look more like elongated huts. They could be beehives – a symbol of industriousness and co-operative action (in particular : a skep, a upsidedown basket covered in mud to provide a home for bees).
  • The lack of symmetry of the large obelisk is clear. Is the obelisk supposed to be a right triangle while the inscribed triangle is an equilateral triangle?
  • The tree behind and to the right of the obelisk appears distinctly different than the other trees. It bears a fruit at top but it is unclear what type of tree it is.
13. in the far left background is a village with a French tricolor flag atop two buildings.
14. to the right of the fasces is a tree labeled "Liberté" (liberty) : a Liberty Tree. Liberty, like a tree, is more likely to thrive if it is nurtured. 
15. to the right of the tree is a partial column "régénération des moeurs – plus une nation est eclairée plus elle sent que Son véritable intérêt est d'obéir a des loix justes et sage – Fénélon" (Regeneration of the morals. The more a nation is illuminated more she feels that his real interest is to obey just laws and has wise – Fénélon)  The sentence between the dashes is a quote from François Fénélon (1651-1715) a critic of the monarchy.
  • leaning against the column are 2 tablets inscribed "droits de l'homme" (rights of man) and "et du citoyen" (and of the citizen)
  • the column rests on a plinth labeled "peint et donné par le of Jeaurat.  l'art a de la republique fin 20 _____ 1794" (paint and given by Jeaurat. The art of the Republic finished 20 _____ 1794) The _____ could be "ventos" although February by the Revolutionary calendar is Ventôse this doesn't appear to match.
16. to the right of the flags are rays of light breaking through the clouds. Symbolic of a new beginning and the end of the storm.
17. in the far right background is a guillotine – a symbol of death, the Terror, mass executions, the revolution, and the end of the monarchy.
18. next to the column is a wheeled cannon (a six pounder?) – a symbol of the French battles against Austrian and Prussian attempts to squash the revolution.
19. next to the cannon is a soldier in a blue & white uniform standing with a rifle on his shoulder. Note that he is wearing knee breeches so he is not a sans-culottes
20. the lower right corner is a man with a mustache in a red Phrygian cap and red belt. He appears to be a sans-culottes. He appears to be looking at the viewer and making a dramatic gesture while out of his right hand he is dropping a handful of something (earth perhaps) or he could be sowing seeds (very large seeds).

Not seen due to the right side of the reproduction being cut off : to the right of the column (#15) are some ruins and a second partial column with writing on it. Since this reproduction is cut off then contrary to the scan above the central elements (the portrait, fasces) are actually more off center and towards the left. Here is the complete image.



Liberty Leading the People, 1830 by Eugène Delacroix.
Liberty Leading the People, 1830 by Eugène Delacroix.

In contrast, in my opinion, a much better painting also about a French revolution (the July Revolution, 1830) is Liberty Leading the People, 1830 by Eugène Delacroix.

Unlike the Jeaurat, the Delacroix is not just a group of symbols just standing there sharing the same space. Delacroix's symbols are doing something discernible.

The portrait of Rousseau is placed above the all seeing eye – above the depiction of a deity. Is that making an intentional symbolic point or is it just incidental? Is it important that the males (including the rooster) are all to the right of the females?  What if the symbolism changes? A cock, for example, might symbolize one thing in revolutionary France but something entirely different a few hundred years later.

What if people don't know the symbolic language? That may be the point. Jeaurat's painting might be intended to be seen as a coded message and as a test of knowledge.

If you have to label things in your painting then I think you are probably doing something wrong.

Sunday, January 27, 2013

Infernal Machine


Giuseppe Fieschi's Infernal Machine - a multibarrel gun used to attempt to kill King Louis Philippe
The Infernale Machine (or what's left of it) - a multibarrel gun. There is something to be said for proper aiming.
On July 28, 1835, the Corsican Giuseppe Fieschi tried to assassinate the French King Louis-Philippe I using his "Machine Infernale" a set of 25 barrels as a single gun. He killed 18 (including former Prime Minister Édouard Mortier) and wounded more but the king was virtually unharmed (as was his sons).  Of course, in an age before antibiotics even a minor wound had the potential to be fatal. Fieschi was wounded by his machine, captured, nursed back to health, tried and executed for attempted regicide.

partial portrait of Giuseppe Fieschi from the head up because the French had cut his head off.
Portrait of Giuseppe Fieschi (after his execution by guillotine – which can be seen in the upper right)

Since it was to be fired from a third story window down towards the boulevard, the rear was elevated about 8 inches higher than the front. The ends of the muskets rested in notches to keep them steady. Some of the notches were a half-inch higher than one another to alter the aim from one barrel to another. With the barrels parallel and loaded with "grape shot" (3-4 slugs, 13-14 buck shot, and then 3-4 more slugs; making a total of about 19 to 22 projectiles per barrel) the intended spread for this fusillade was about 25 feet wide by 10 feet high (or so says An Historical and Biographical Sketch of Fieschi by A. Bouveiron, 1835). If the barrels had been slightly converging instead of mostly parallel then it may have been more effective. Or if his goal was to kill as many people as possible then having them diverge more (like a duckfoot gun) may have been more effective.

Giuseppe Fieschi's Infernal Machine used to attempt to kill King Louis Philippe
note the wave like, roughly hewn support under the barrels to adjust the elevation.

Four of the barrels failed to fire, two other barrels exploded in the room injuring Fieschi, two exploded outwards, and one had not been made with a touch hole for ignition so it had been left unloaded. Four of the barrels were stamped with the mark "rebut" (waste) and 3 of those so marked were among those that exploded.

Explosion De La Machine Infernale
Explosion De La Machine Infernale, woodcut engraving by Jean-Baptiste Thiebault and Jacques Prosper Hubert, 1835

With a total of 7 failures, only 18 barrels and approximately 342 to 396 projectiles attacked the king.  There was no pivot or swivel so once positioned the aim could not be refined. The French military used a similar design called jeu d'orgue d'artillerie (organ playing artillery) except it had fewer barrels, a more fanned out design and was on a pivot to be aimable.

diagram of Giuseppe Fieschi's Infernal Machine and his attempt to kill French King Louis Philippe
diagram showing Fieschi and his infernal machine
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bjacques/3423290693/in/photostream/
Title (translation follows in italics) : L'assassin Fieschi, (dit Gerard) agé de 42 ans, né en Corse; et sa Mécanique infernale. Paris le 28 Juillet 1835. (The assassin Fieschi (called Gerard) aged 42 years, born in Corsica;  and the Infernal Machine. Paris July 28, 1835.)

Judicateur (Judicator)
 A. Chambre dans le maison no 30 boulvard du temple, ou Feischi pointe sa machine de 25 canons à fusil. (A. Room in the house No. 30 Temple Boulevard or Feischi points his machine of 25 muskets.)
B. Louis-Philippe 1 avec son état major. (B. Louis-Philippe 1 with his staff.)
C. Bataillons passés en recue. (C. Battalions in review.)
D. Le marchand de vin. (D. The wine merchant.)
E. Population Parisienne. (E. Parisian population.)
F. Jardin turc (ambulance improvisée) (F. Turkish Garden (improvised ambulance))
G. Café et balcon du dit jardine. (G. Café and balcony of the mentioned garden.)

The text on the right seems to say basically the same thing but in Dutch.
Ceregtwÿzer
A. Kamer van het huis, boulvard du Temple No. 50; waar Fieschi deszelfs helsch-wektuig van 25 geweerloopen stelt
B. Lodewÿk-Philippus 1 met deszelfs staf
C. Revu-troepen
D. Huis en uitstek van den wÿnkooper
E. Volksmenigte
F. Turkschen tuin (provisioneel hospitaal)
G. Coffyhuis en balkon van dien tuin.


Louis Philippe I, the last King of France*, is interesting if only that in post-revolution France (post-1789 and post-July revolutions  – but not post-1848 revolution) he wore not a crown, a gown and foppish tights but his military uniform.
Portrait of French King Louis Philippe by Franz Xaver Winterhalter looking a lot less gay than some other French Kings.
French King Louis Philippe looking 70% less gaudy, effeminate and matronly than his predecessor Charles X.
* Louis Philippe was the "last King of France" in the sense that France hasn't had any Kings since, but since Louis XVI in 1791 the title used was "the King of the French" to link the king to the people as opposed to the land.

Honoré Daumier's 1831 caricature of King Louis Philippe turning into a pear is also noteworthy.

Honoré Daumier's 1831 caricature of King Louis Philippe turning into a pear. Early sequential art. Daumier transformé la figure du roi dans une poire
King Louis Philippe turning into a pear.





Monday, January 21, 2013

a shortcut in fine art


Barnard Castle and Bridge, from downstream by Joseph Mallord William Turner, 1797
Pencil, 230 x 270mm (9" x 10.6"), North of England sketchbook
from the book Turner in the North p 49


The photo below of the same castle (built 1093) and bridge from a similar view is from Turner in the North page 48 :

Barnard Castle And Bridge, from Downstream drawing by Joseph Mallord William Turner, 1797

Some of the differences between the drawing and the photo is due to them being created 200 years apart.

One detail I would call attention to is the "x" on the buildings on the lower right probably as a little shortcut to note shadowed areas for future reference.
detail from Barnard Castle And Bridge, from Downstream drawing by Joseph Mallord William Turner, 1797
detail of the lower right of the image above with several 'x' highlighted in red


Thursday, January 17, 2013

Not a painting

Kate Middleton's official portrait painting

It isn't a painting but a photograph that has been printed using a labor intensive process involving paint.

It has that look of someone imitating a photo where they carefully transcribe each small detail they see in the photo but then the hair is given a different, less detail conscious treatment. It happens a lot.

The expression is also a photographic moment frozen in time. People don't see one another that way; we see the start point and end point of an expression and a blur and an approximation of what we think the transition expression is. Consequently, I think it looks less natural and I think most people can tell instinctively when it is based on a photograph.

As a photo, it isn't that bad (although it probably be better in black & white) but as a painting it lacks. It lacks charm and panache (In contrast, Feliks Topolski painted the British monarchy
 with what some might call an overdose of panache). Maybe there is a painterly quality when someone stands in front of it but I have my doubts.

This guy refers to it as "[a] jowly face that will now be staring at us… Is that scratchy rug atop her head really meant to be Kate's famously silken locks? And what's going on with the mean, wierdly [sic] spaced eyes? And don't get me started on the nose." (Is a writer who refers to himself as "the Royalist" required to write like a Drama Queen?)
the source photo used for Kate Middleton's official portrait painting by Paul Emsley
The photographic basis of the painting.  If the photocopier hadn't been invented he could have gotten a job at Xerox.

Kate Middleton's official portrait painting showing her enormously oversized head with the artist Paul Emsley and the press
Kate Middleton's official portrait with the artist Paul Emsley (I suspect her head isn't really that large in person)
The above 2 pics are from here.  Personally, I think making the painting larger than life size can make it a worse painting. A little larger than life (say, 10%) makes it seem heroically large (exaggerated but still within the realm of being realistic). Extraordinarily larger than life (10x, like Chuck Close) makes it a landscape of humanity.  In between is this picture : a lot larger than life (2x) which makes it seem oversized and perhaps grotesque. It reminds me of advertising art on the side of a building that was intended to be seen from a distance.