The article, filed under health for some reason as opposed to mindless wanking, is titled : "Why kids love 'fascist' cartoons like 'Paw Patrol' and 'Thomas'"
Among these cartoons' many critics exists a subgroup of parents who are OK with some degree of autocracy and Manichean dualistic politics but just wish they would be presented with more nuance.Manichean means everything is either black or white which they're ok with if it has more nuance so everything isn't either black or white.
Bonus dumbness from the story highlights bulletpoints :
"Thomas the Tank Engine" and "Paw Patrol" have been eviscerated by the press and on social mediaBy which the author means by almost nobody.
Second bonus dumbness :
Here's an idea, gratis, for the creative team behind of "Paw Patrol" and "Thomas," should they want to broaden their appeal to parents without alienating their fan base: Ryder and Sir Topham Hatt retire and are replaced by their equally domineering sisters. This, in turn, boosts the social status of all the non-male characters. Children would still get the satisfaction of immersing themselves in an orderly universe where rules are rules, and everyone is in his or her place. Just without the white guy on top.Just to be clear, Elissa Strauss is A-OK with what she describes as fascist if it isn't a white guy on top.